Home | Organization | Heritage | Issues | MountainWatch (PDF) | Directory | Links

For questions or comments, contact Alec Ciesluk, NYS DEC, at (845) 256-3014 or afcieslu@gw.dec.state.ny.us .

Project Description
Cover Sheet
Executive Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Location
1.2 General Project Description
1.3 Project Purpose, Need and Benefits
1.4 Environmental Review, Permits and Approvals
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
2.1 Overall Project Design and Layout
2.2 Project Components
2.3 Construction Activities
2.4 Operational Stage Activities
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
3.1 Geologic and Topographic Resources
3.2 Surface Water Resources
3.3 Groundwater Resources
3.4 Climate and Air Resources
3.5 Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology
3.6 Soils
3.7 Traffic Patterns
3.8 Land Use and Community Character
3.9 Community Services
3.10 Socio-Economic Setting
3.11 Cultural Resources
4.0 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
5.0 ALTERNATIVES
5.1 Alternative Locations
5.2 Alternative Use of the Site
5.3 Alternative Layouts
5.4 Alternative Water Supply
5.5 Alternative Wastewater Disposal
5.6 Alternative Site Access
5.7 Alternative Golf Course Management Practices
5.8 Alternative Stormwater Management Practices
5.9 No-Action Alternative
6.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES
7.0 GROWTH INDUCING, SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
8.0 EFFECT ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
9.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION
Attachment 1. Potable Water Supply
Attachment 2. Wastewater Disposal
Attachment 3. Stormwater and Sediment and Erosion Control
Attachment 4. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species
Attachment 5. Traffic
Attachment 6. Visual Resources and Aesthetics
Attachment 7. Cultural Resources
Attachment 8. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan



FINAL SCOPING DOCUMENT
FOR
THE PROPOSED BELLEAYRE RESORT AT THE CATSKILL PARK
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS)

Project Description

Crossroads Ventures, LLC is proposing to develop a recreation-oriented resort development that would be located south of New York Route 28 and on either side of Belleayre Mountain Ski Center. The area that comprises the project site consists of approximately 2,000 acres, 1,200 acres that are located east of the ski center and 800 acres west of the ski center. Of this 2,000 acres, approximately 500 acres would be affected by the proposed project and approximately 1,500 acres will remain undeveloped. Overall, the project consists of a mix of uses including recreational, residential and hotel with associated limited commercial development.

The lands to the west of Belleayre Mountain Ski Center consist of three areas known as Wildacres, Highmount, and Leach. One of the project's two 18-hole golf courses will be constructed at Wildacres. Development at Wildacres will also include two lodges with a combined 250 suites, 10 hotel-contained shops totaling approximately 20,000 square feet, and four restaurants/bars. Also proposed at Wildacres are 25 timeshare buildings to house 200 units, a conference center, a golf clubhouse, an interfaith chapel, golf course maintenance building(s), and a building for receiving/storage. The existing buildings at the former Highmount ski area will be adaptively re-used to provide a family activities center. A 20-lot residential subdivision is proposed on the former Leach property west of the old Highmount ski area. Central water and sewer is proposed for all of these components. All proposed internal roads will be private roads.

Two areas would be developed east of the ski center. East of Giggle Hollow the Big Indian Country Club is proposed. In addition to a signature championship 18-hole golf course, development in this area would include a 150-suite lodge including the golf clubhouse, 2 restaurants, meeting rooms, and a pool/spa. Sixty-five (65) detached lodging units would be built around the golf course. A golf course maintenance building is also proposed. West of Giggle Hollow and in the vicinity of the existing Turner Mansion 120 dwelling units are proposed within 30 timeshare buildings. Central water and sewer is proposed for all of these components. All proposed internal roads will be private roads.

DEIS Content
COVER SHEET
The cover sheet shall state that the document is a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), and also include the title of the action, the project location, the name and address of the Lead Agency, the names of the authors of the DEIS, a list of Involved Agencies, and the date of completion and date by which comments must be submitted.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The executive summary shall provide a synopsis of the DEIS. The Executive Summary shall include summaries of the environmental setting, proposed actions, impacts and proposed mitigation measures, and alternatives to the proposed actions. A description of the permits and approvals required for completion of the proposed project shall also be included.

Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Appendices

Section.1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Location

1.2 General Project Description

1.3 Project Purpose, Need and Benefits

1.3.1 Background and History
  • Describe historical background of the area as a resort destination.
  • Describe Belleayre Mountain Ski Center in terms of history of operation, improvements, visitation trends and State management options.
  • Provide a description of prior uses of the project site.
  • Provide a description of the background and history of local land use regulations and regional land use plans, comprehensive plans and regional land use plans.

1.3.2 Public Need for the Project

  • Describe the need for the type of resort facilities to be provided by the project including information from any marketing studies performed for the project.
  • Specific information that shall be included to address viability concerns include marketing analyses, investor protection, details of a proposed build out, management options, job categories, employment aspects, training programs, etc. Pertinent documentation will be included in the Appendix, "Fiscal and Marketing Information".

1.3.3 Objectives

  • Discuss the relationship of this project to the published economic development strategy for the region.

1.3.4 Benefits of the Proposed Action

  • Discuss potential benefits to Belleayre Mountain Ski Center, improved wastewater management opportunities, and economic benefits to the community and the region.

1.4 Environmental Review, Permits and Approvals

1.4.1 Local
  • Identify any permits or approvals required from the Town Boards, Planning Boards and Zoning Boards of Appeals in both the Town of Shandaken and the Town of Middletown.
  • Discuss construction bonding requirements of the local municipalities' financial assurance requirements.

1.4.2 County

  • Identify the permits and approvals required from Ulster County And Delaware County including Health Department, Planning Department and Highway Department.

1.4.3 Regional

  • Identify the permits and approvals required from regional agencies including NYCDEP.
1.4.4 State
  • Identify the permits and approvals required from State agencies including NYSDEC, NYSDOT and NYSDOH.
1.4.5 Federal
  • Identify the permits and approvals required from federal agencies including the US Army Corps of Engineers.


Section 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION

2.1 Overall Project Design and Layout

2.2 Project Components

2.2.1 Golf Facilities
  • Describe the location and types of golf facilities including courses (length, par, etc.), practice facilities, buildings (clubhouse, maintenance), and irrigation ponds.
  • Discuss the suitability of the project site for golf course development including such parameters as elevation, climate, terrain and soil conditions.

2.2.2 Buildings

  • Describe the location, sizes, and architectural style of buildings being proposed. Typical exterior character of proposed buildings shall be illustrated in elevation drawings.

2.2.3 Potable Water Supply

  • Identify the sources of potable water supply and discuss their capacity to serve the proposed project as well as any interrelationships with other existing water supply systems.
  • The methodologies that will be used to identify and quantify potable water supply are discussed in detail in Attachment I of this document.

2.2.4 Wastewater Disposal

  • Identify the methods proposed for wastewater disposal and the locations where wastewater disposal is proposed.
  • The methodologies that will be used to identify the methods for wastewater disposal are discussed in detail in Attachment 2 of this document

2.2.5 Irrigation Water Supply

  • Identify the sources of irrigation water supply and discuss their capacity to meet demand, including the use of treated wastewater effluent.
  • Provide information that is necessary to demonstrate that the quality of the water identified as the irrigation source(s) is/are suitable for irrigating golf course turfgrass.

2.2.6 Site Drainage and Grading

  • Discuss the general drainage characteristics of the site and also identify subcatchments within the project site.
  • Illustrate grading proposed within development areas and discuss how development will affect subcatchment boundaries and stormwater runoff.
  • Provide a grading plan showing grading on at least a five-foot interval.
  • Provide cut and fill estimates for those areas where cuts and fills are not balanced.
  • Provide estimates of the size of proposed impervious surfaces.
  • Discuss and illustrate proposed stormwater control measures.
  • The methodologies that will be used to analyze stormwater generation and stormwater control are discussed in more detail in Attachment 3 of this document.

2.2.7 Traffic, Parking and Pedestrian Circulation

  • In the context of existing conditions discuss the proposed project-generated traffic, access to the project, parking location and capacity, internal vehicular circulation and pedestrian access provided within the project.
  • Discuss the potential for ATV or snowmobile use on the site, and if these uses are not prohibited on the site, what mechanisms will be put into place to prevent trespass onto nearby State Forest Preserve lands.
  • Road maintenance activities, particularly winter maintenance, shall be discussed.

2.2.8 Lighting

  • Discuss and illustrate the location and type of lighting that will occur within the project, including motion-sensitive lighting, cutoff light fixtures and recessed light fixtures.

2.2.9 Landscaping and Open Space Management

  • Discuss and illustrate how open space within the development will be landscaped and how existing vegetation will be maintained.
  • The DEIS shall discuss the use of native versus non-native plant materials.
  • The DEIS shall discuss other potential recreational uses, such as trails, rove courses, etc., Proposed for areas outside of development footprints.

2.2.10 Signage

  • Signage, on-site and off site, shall be described, located, and illustrated.

2.2.11 Utilities

  • Utilities required to serve the project shall be identified, the quantity of utility service required by the project shall be estimated and service providers shall be identified and asked to confirm that capacity exists to serve the project.
  • If geothermal heating systems are proposed, provide specific techniques of installations and analysis of impacts of installation and operation of such systems.

2.3 Construction Activities

2.3.1 Construction Schedule
  • An overall construction schedule shall be provided including the sequencing of construction activities, and approximate duration of each construction event.
  • Where possible, the effects of the proposed construction schedule on such things as land disturbance, exposed soils, traffic generation, water use, wastewater disposal, and solid waste management shall be quantified.
  • Routing of construction vehicles shall be described as well as routes and parking sites for construction workers. Estimates of daily truck traffic shall be provided plus the duration of such traffic. If excess material from site grading (cut) will result in off-site removal, truck routes and disposal sites shall be identified and corresponding data provided if fill is to be imported. Methods of handling and storing construction materials shall be described.

2.3.2 Construction Stage Activities

  • This section of the DEIS shall provide more detail regarding activities such as clearing and grubbing, installation of erosion control measures, rough grading, final grading, installation of infrastructure and utilities, building construction, landscaping and golf course grow-in.
  • Blasting shall be discussed with attention given to effects on such things as traffic, noise, air quality, erosion and sedimentation. Details on the effects on these parameters shall be provided in relevant subsections of section 3.
  • The DEIS shall also contain a Blasting Management Plan describing BMP's to be employed.
  • This section of the DEIS shall also discuss construction inspection methods and procedures for the local municipalities and other regulatory agencies.
  • The DEIS shall provide a description of the envisioned sequence of construction activities.

2.4 Operational Stage Activities



Section 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

3.1 Geologic and Topographic Resources

3.2 Surface Water Resources

3.3 Groundwater Resources

3.4 Climate and Air Resources

3.5 Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology

3.5.1 Vegetation
  • A survey of the vegetation on the project site shall be performed with particular attention paid to areas that have potential to be developed.
  • Provide a map of the vegetation communities on the project site consistent with community types defined by Reschke (1990).
  • Provide a description of the each of the plant communities including dominant species and relative age, including identification of unusually mature vegetation.
  • Provide a comprehensive list of plant species found on the project site including the identification of any rare threatened or endangered species found on the project site.
  • Provide a comparison of the amount of the different vegetation community types on the property with and without the proposed project.
  • The impacts of the loss and conversion of native vegetation shall be assessed from the standpoint of soil erosion, evapotranspiration, precipitation recharge, and provision of food and cover for wildlife.
  • Impacts to any rare, threatened, endangered plant species shall be discussed in the DEIS.
  • Mitigation measures such as restricting clearing in particular areas. maintenance of specimen trees, replanting, native vegetation, transplanting, etc. shall be considered as mitigation measures based on the analysis for potentially significant impacts to plant communities.

3.5.2 Wetlands (other waters of the US discussed in Surface Waters)

  • A figure illustrating- the delineated wetland boundaries on the project site shall be included as part of the DEIS. Both state and federal wetland boundaries shall be shown as will any state wetland adjacent areas.
  • The DEIS shall include a brief description of the delineation methodology. The federal wetland delineation report shall be appended to the DEIS.
  • The DEIS shall also include a description of the different wetlands including location, size, hydrological relationship to the rest of the property, and type and value of wetland plant communities. Site planning consideration given to wetlands shall be discussed in the DEIS.
  • All activities in Federal and State wetlands shall be quantified in the DEIS, including filling, excavating, or otherwise disturbing as a result of the proposed project.
  • The DEIS shall also discuss what measures were taken to avoid or minimize wetland impacts.
  • In addition to quantifying wetland impacts, the DEIS shall provide an analysis of the loss of the functions and benefits of the impacted wetlands. Impacts to wetland hydrology as a result of changes in vegetation cover, erosion and sedimentation, irrigation and other factors shall be addressed in the DEIS.
  • The DEIS shall also assess potential impacts to wetlands as a result of golf course management practices analyzed in the IPM plan.
  • Permitting requirements for any wetland activities shall be discussed in the DEIS.
  • The DEIS shall include a wetland mitigation plan to compensate for any losses in wetland function and value. The mitigation plan shall specify the areas and location of any proposed wetland mitigation.
  • Methods of creation, development of wetland hydrology and planting of wetland vegetation shall be described in the DEIS and illustrated on appropriate plans.

3.5.3 Wildlife

  • The DEIS shall contain a description of the fauna of the project site based upon field investigations, file searches of regulatory agencies, and document research.
  • Attachment 4 of this document details the methodologies that will be used to identify the wildlife using the project site.
  • Fish, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals shall all be considered. The fauna description shall include discussion of any rare, threatened, endangered, or special concern wildlife species known to occur on the project site as well as significant habitats on the property such as deer wintering areas.
  • A list shall be compiled of all species observed on the site and those species likely to occur on the site based on habitat requirements and geographical distribution. The inventory of fauna on the site shall be correlated with the plant community mapping described in section 3.5.1 above.
  • On-site investigations shall be made at more than one time during the year so as to attempt to identify summer resident species as opposed to transient species that may only occur on the project site during migration.
  • The DEIS shall address impacts to wildlife as a result of loss and changes of habitat types provided by the different plant communities, habitat fragmentation, and golf course maintenance practices.
  • A qualitative analysis shall be provided to determine the post-construction carrying capacity for the site for various wildlife species including forest interior species, edge species, human tolerant species, and human intolerant species. Particular attention shall be paid to any habitats previously identified as sensitive or high value habitats.
  • Impacts to aquatic and semi-aquatic species as a result of surface water and wetland impacts, sediment and erosion control, hydrological changes, construction of ponds, and water quality impacts from golf course management activities shall be addressed in the DEIS.
  • Mitigation measures shall be provided in the DEIS for impacts identified as potentially significant. Potential mitigation measures may include creation of mitigation wetlands, conservation of wildlife corridors and protection of habitats during the operational phase.

3.6 Soils

3.7 Traffic Patterns

3.8 Land Use and Community Character

3.8.1 Existing Use of Site
  • Discuss the existing uses of the site, including the use of State hiking trails, portions of which pass through private property that is part of the project site.
  • Describe impacts to use of State hiking trails on the property as a result of the development of the proposed project.
  • Propose suitable mitigation measures related to continued use of State trails in the area.

3.8.2 Adjacent Land Uses and Community Character

  • Provide a description of uses of adjacent lands and in the general vicinity of the project site (Route 28 corridor from Boiceville to Margaretville), including State lands.
  • This section shall provide a discussion of how the proposed project may effect future land use of other property in the vicinity of the site and how the project will alter current land use of the site. The relationship of this project to other development projects in the area, either under construction or under review, shall be assessed.
  • The DEIS shall provide a description of how the project complies with local zoning regulations in terms of use, density, etc.
  • The DEIS shall address the potential impact of the project on the former Ulster and Delaware Railroad, including existing bridges, road crossings and other features. All proposed at-grade crossings must be made in accordance with all applicable regulations.
  • The introduction of the project on the proposed project site shall be assessed from the standpoint of currently undeveloped land in the vicinity, and the type of future development of such lands if the project was to be developed.
  • The proposed project's compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding lands shall be addressed in the DEIS.
  • Discuss construction bonding requirements of the local municipalities and how these requirements can address concerns related to project economic viability.

3.8.3 Local and Regional Land Use Plans

  • The DEIS shall discuss how the proposed project and local land planning decisions required for the project could affect future land use plans both locally and regionally.
  • The local and regional land use plans to be addressed shall include County land use plans and DEC management plans. Any data and analysis compiled by municipal comprehensive plan committees, if available, shall also be considered.

3.8.4 Visual Resources and Aesthetics

Visual Resources

  • Characterize the existing visual environment focusing primarily on the visibility of the project from surrounding lands.
  • A visual impact study will be performed to determine the visibility of the project from surrounding lands, including visibili1y at night and the issue nighttime "sky glow" and direct glare.
  • The methodology that will be used to perform the visual impact study is described in Attachment 6 of this document and shall be consistent with the July 31, 2000 NYSDEC Program Policy "Assessing and Mitigating Visual Impacts.
  • The visual impact study will determine the zone of visibility and identify potentially sensitive receptors for the proposed development footprints. Sensitive receptors shall include those listed in the aforementioned NYSDEC Program Policy as well as all public roads, public parking areas, public gathering areas, public recreational areas, and public hiking trails within a five-mile radius. Potential vista views from peaks on public hiking trails outside of the five-mile radius shall also be examined.
  • On a clear day with good visibility examine each area identified as having the potential for views into the project. Examinations shall take place during both leaf-on conditions and leaf-off conditions. Examinations shall consist of driving roads, walking hiking trails, and visiting sensitive receptors identified as having potential views.
  • Include in the DEIS paired photograph-based representative views of visual conditions with and without the development of the project. These views shall include those most significantly affected near views as well as affected vista views. Views shall include foreground, middleground, and background views and be based on most unobstructed views, public vantage points, particularly those with high user levels, and geographic distribution.
  • The DEIS shall discuss suitable measures to mitigate potential impacts. The discussion shall include measures such as project component locations, structure heights, use of earth tone colors, non-reflective glass, cut-off light fixtures, and other similar type measures.
Sound Resources
  • The existing sound levels on and around the project site shall be characterized based upon existing land uses (stationary sources) and traffic (mobile sources) levels.
  • Sound pressure levels shall be described in a-weighted decibels (dBA) and the sound environment shall be characterized using the time equivalent level (Leq).
  • Construction and operation sound levels associated with the project shall be determined taking into consideration both mobile and stationary sources. This shall be accomplished by identifying sensitive receptor locations in relation to proposed new sources, calculating source levels, and projecting sound levels at various distances from the various sources and at sensitive receptor locations.
  • Impact assessment methodologies will be consistent with those Prepared by the Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise, "Guidelines for Considering Noise in Land Use Planning and Control" the Department of Housing and Urban Development, "Noise Assessment Guidelines", and the Federal Highway Administration, "Noise Barrier Design Handbook".
  • Where necessary, suitable mitigation measures aimed at attenuating potential sound impacts will be proposed, including such things as hours of operation, types of equipment, etc. Mitigation measures shall attempt to quantify the reduction in sound levels that would be accomplished by the proposed measures.

3.9 Community and State Facility Services

3.9.1 Emergency Services (including fire, ambulance and medical)
3.9.2 Police
3.9.3 Potable Water (if not on-site)
3.9.4 Wastewater (if not on-site)
3.9.5 Solid Waste / Recycling
3.9.6 Utilities
3.9.7 Schools
3.9.8 Recreation Facilities (including Belleayre Mountain Ski Center and other surrounding Catskill Park State Lands as well as demands on local (municipal) recreational facilities)

3.10 Socio-Economic Setting

• Fiscal and Economic Benefits Analysis
The project will generate substantial employment opportunities, new economic activity, and tax revenues during both the construction and operation periods. The following tasks would be performed to generate a complete profile of fiscal and economic costs and benefits within the study area.

• Existing Conditions
Provide Existing Demographic and Economic Profile.
A demographic and economic profile of the communities within the study area will be compiled and described in terms of population and employment patterns. Based on information available from local, county, state, and federal sources, employment and economic baseline information by key industries (i.e., mining, agriculture, tourism) will be summarized and described. Any potential new commercial development projects that could affect local employment patterns in the region would be identified through discussions with local and county government representatives.

• Construction Phase
Estimate Construction Generated Economic Activity.
Based on the estimated capital investment for Belleayre Resort, the economic analysis will summarize the key economic benefits associated with the Project. These benefits include direct activity associated with construction wages and salaries and the purchase of goods and materials, as well as the ripple- or multiplier-effect generated as this economic activity is felt in the larger regional economy (including tax revenues generated by the construction project). The analysis will utilize the econometric model, Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II), developed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and customized for the project area.

• Operations Phase
Estimate Potential Economic Benefits.
Based on anticipated employment generated by the project once it is completed and operational, a similar evaluation of the total economic effects would be Prepared also using the RIMS II model. This effort would summarize the estimated number of jobs to be generated during operation of the proposed resort (along with anticipated wages and salaries) and how much this increased expenditure in the local economy will create demand for goods and services and labor in the regional economy. The study will evaluate whether the existing labor supply can meet the expected increased demand. Where demand for labor exceeds the local and regional supply, some secondary impacts may occur from new residential development (see Growth Inducing Aspects, below). The proposed resort will be described in terms of future employment, annual payroll, and property taxes to each of the taxing jurisdictions. Property taxes would be calculated based on current tax rates and assessment practices within each of the taxing jurisdictions.

• Evaluate Potential Community-Related Costs.
Changes in property tax revenues will be summarized and evaluated in comparison with the potential increases in the cost of providing municipal services such as provision of emergency services to the new facility and any public infrastructure improvements required to service the facility. In coordination with Section 7.9, the projected demand for police, fire, and ambulance services and any public infrastructure would be used to estimate new potential costs to municipal governments based on the project and any projected new population within the residential communities.

3.11 Cultural Resources



Section 4.0 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Section 5.0 ALTERNATIVES

5.1 Alternative Locations

5.2 Alternative Use of the Site

5.3 Alternative Layouts

5.4 Alternative Water Supply

5.5 Alternative Wastewater Disposal

5.6 Alternative Site Access

5.7 Alternative Golf Course Management Practices

5.8 Alternative Stormwater Management Practices

5.9 No-Action Alternative

Section 6.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES

Section 7.0 GROWTH INDUCING, SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION In order to perform this analysis, the following specific tasks are required:

Section 8.0 EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY

Section 9.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION

MAPS

EXHIBITS

APPENDICES

Appendix SEQRA Documentation including, Environmental Assessment Form, Positive Declaration and Final Scope for the DEIS

Appendix Wetlands Delineation Report and Ecological Communities Descriptions

Appendix Water Supply Report

Appendix Wastewater Disposal Report

Appendix Stormwater Management Plan

Appendix Visual Impact Study

Appendix Traffic Impact Study

Appendix Stage 1A and Stage 1B Cultural Resources Investigations

Appendix Fertilizer and Pesticide Risk Assessment

Appendix Integrated Pest Management Plan

Appendix Draft Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan

Appendix Letters of Record from Regulatory Agencies and Local Service Providers

Appendix Draft Homeowners Association Agreement

Appendix Secondary and Cumulative Impacts


Attachment 1. Potable Water Supply

Potential sources of potable water will be identified and evaluated in accordance with Title 10 of the New York State Code of Rules and Regulations, Part 5 - Drinking Water Supplies. The purpose of this evaluation is to identify potential sources of supply, determine the anticipated capacity of each supply and to determine the water quality of each supply. In addition, methods to determine treatment, storage and distribution will also be evaluated. This evaluation will be conducted as described in (a) through (h) below.
a) USGS geologic, NRCS soils maps, and onsite soils mapping prepared to 0.5 acre accuracy will be studied to identify potential physical formations that Would be likely well locations, such as bedrock fracture zones, and areas of high permeability soil.
b) Investigate existing groundwater supplies (wells and springs) to determine depth of wells, yield, and water quality. This will include: consultation with local well drillers and/or property owners; metering flow from springs; water sampling and analysis to determine compliance with Part 5 water quality standards; investigating water company records to determine historic capacity of existing springs; performing hydrogeologic assessment of existing springs to determine seasonal impacts on capacity, and potential for influence by surface water.
c) Investigate existing surface water supplies for capacity, water quality and impact of water use on downstream users. This will include: an analysis of the drainage basin to determine estimated recharge and impacts of variation in rainfall (water budget). Water samples will be collected and analyzed to determine compliance with Part 5 water quality standards, including the testing requirements in tables 1 through 12 in 10NYCRR Part 5-1.
d) Perform yield tests on new wells to determine well capacity and sustainability. Conduct water sampling for Part 5 standards to determine water quality.
e) USGS historical surface water monitoring data will be obtained and extrapolated to determine the potential impact of water draw to surface waters within the project vicinity including potential impacts to water availability for snowmaking at Belleayre Mountain ski center.
f) Determine the need to protect groundwater and surface water supplies from potential sources of contamination based on NYS DOH and Recommended Standards for Water Works (Ten States Standards for Water Works), 1997 ed. standards. Identify Best Available Practice protective measures as recommended by NYSDOH and Ten States Standards.
g) Estimate potable water demand by determining, anticipated number of consumer units and multiplying by anticipated per unit usage based oil US EPA "Planning Guide for Water Use." Estimates of water demand will be made for each development area.
h) Requirements of water treatment will be assessed as mandated by US EPA Guidance for Compliance with Filtration and Disinfection Requirements for Public Water Systems, Ten States Standards for Water Works, and NYS DOH guidance as well as Ulster and Delaware county health department requirements.
Describe components of any proposed water conservation program and provide estimates of the quantities how any such components could decrease potential demands.


Attachment 2. Wastewater Disposal

Wastewater disposal methods will be identified and evaluated in accordance with Federal, State and New York City rules and regulations. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the anticipated volume and characteristics of the wastewater to be generated and to identify alternatives for the treatment and/or disposal of the wastewater. This evaluation will be conducted as described in (a) through (h) below.
a) USGS maps, Soil Conservation Service maps, and on-site soils maps prepare to 0.5 acre accuracy will be studied to identify those areas within the proposed developments that are amenable to the installation of subsurface disposal systems.
b) Investigate existing surface water bodies to determine if they are suitable as receiving streams for effluent discharged from wastewater treatment systems. This will include the review of USGS historical surface water monitoring data to determine the potential impact to surface waters within the project vicinity.
c) Estimate volume and quality of wastewater generated by determining anticipated number of wastewater generating units (i.e. lodging and residential units, clubhouse dining seats, etc.) and multiplying by anticipated per unit usage based on New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Design Standards for Wastewater Works and New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP), Rules and Regulations for the Protection from Contamination, Degradation and Pollution of the New York City Water Supply and its Sources.
d) Requirements of wastewater treatment will be assessed as mandated by Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities (Ten States Standards); NYSDEC rules and regulations relating to the collection, treatment, disposal and monitoring of wastewater; and NYCDEP, b.
e) Investigate the feasibility of treatment of wastewater from all or some of the proposed developments at nearest Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW). This will involve an evaluation of treatability, available treatment capacity, State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit compliance, and cost.
f) Determine the best location for on-site treatment facilities based on such factors as topography, geology, environmental assessment, and effluent discharge points.
g) Investigate the feasibility of recycling treatment plant effluent for non-potable uses such as golf course irrigation.
h) Determine best practical treatment technologies for each proposed development area by evaluating: administrative implementability, technical feasibility, compliance with regulatory requirements, constructability, ability to recycle effluent for non-potable use, and cost.


Attachment 3. Stormwater and Sediment and Erosion Control
1. The methodologies for the assessment of potential for impacts associated with stormwater and sediment and erosion control and design of mitigation measures will be consistent with the following;
HydroCAD Stormwater Modeling System (V 5.01). Applied Microcomputer Systems. 1998.
Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff From New Development. NYSDEC. 1992.
Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control. US Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Service. 1997.
Storm Water Management For Construction Activities, Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices. USEPA. 1992.
SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges tom Construction Activities that are Classified as "Associated with Construction Activity Permit No. GP-93-06. NYSDEC. 1993.
Rules and Regulations for the Protection tom Contamination, Degradation and Pollution of the New York City Water Supply and its Sources. New York City. 1997.
2. Stormwater analysis of pre-construction and post-construction conditions will be performed using the USDA SCS TR-20 based HydroCAD (V 5.01) analysis. This will include the following.
a. The project site and surroundings will be subdivided into subcatchments using existing topography (2 to 5 foot contour interval for project site and 10 foot contour interval for off-site areas).
b. Adjustments to post-construction subcatchment boundaries will be made based on grading plans prepared for the project.
c. Area-weighted curve numbers will be assigned to each subcatchment based on detailed on-site soil mapping of project site soils and USDANRCS mapping of off site areas, as well as vegetation cover-types based upon on site investigations and aerial photograph interpretation of off-site vegetation.
d. Post-construction weighted curve numbers will be calculated from project layout plans.
e. Type two curve storms for the 2-year, 10-year, 25-year and 100-year return interval will be simulated for pre- and post-development conditions.
f. Stormwater control measures such as retention and detention areas will be designed based on runoff volumes, peak runoff rates and times of concentration of runoff from the different return interval storms.
3. Grading plans at five foot contour intervals will be used to develop sediment and erosion control plans.
4. Erosion control measures will be designed for all areas of disturbance and will include the following.
a. Sediment and erosion control plans will give preference to nonstructural methods such as temporary infiltration basins sized to capture the first one half of runoff (1,800 cubic feet of storage per acre served).
b. Sediment and erosion control plans shall also indicate methods of vegetative stabilization, including sodding, and geotextile stabilization where appropriate.
c. Structural erosion control measures such as silt fences, staked hay bales, etc. will be designed for areas of lesser slopes and shorter slope lengths.
d. The DEIS will include a discussion of inspection and maintenance procedures for erosion control measures.


Attachment 4. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species

1. File searches of the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program and US Fish and Wildlife Service databases will be requested. File searches will be performed for known occurrences of listed rare, threatened, endangered or special concern animals, plants and natural communities, and/or significant wildlife habitats within the project site and surroundings.

2. Any NYSDEC or USFWS reported occurrences on the site will be investigated for that particular occurrence. Regardless of occurrences being reported for the project site, flora and fauna surveys will be conducted on the project site.

3. Vegetation studies to inventory species and identify natural plant communities and habitats consistent with community types defined by Reschke (1990) will be performed. Limits of plant community occurrences will be determined first from interpretation of aerial photographs. Final mapping of plant communities will be produced from on site investigations

4. A comprehensive list of plant species found on the project site including the identification of any rare threatened or endangered species found on the project site will be developed from a survey of the different plant community types identified in paragraph 3.

5. Rare or unique habitats/natural communities that could support rare, threatened, or endangered species will also be identified when performing the task in paragraph 3. This shall include, but not be limited to the following; timber rattlesnakes, bald eagles, red-shallered hawk, peregrine falcon, Coopers hawk, Indiana bat, and species of wild orchids and ladies slippers.

6. Wildlife species consisting of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians observed directly in the various on-site communities in the field will be documented. Wildlife signs (e.g. song, nests, tracks, scat, burrows, markings, etc.) will also be recorded as observed.

7. Bird census work will be performed for resident and migratory species. The bird census work will be performed in the spring (migratory species) and summer (resident/breeding species) months. Census work will occur on four consecutive days each in spring and summer, and each day will include early morning hours. Census work will include all of the habitat types present on the project site. All birds seen or heard will be recorded to the lowest possible classification.

8. Potential habitats for reptiles and amphibians (frogs, salamanders, turtles and snakes) will be specifically searched. These habitats primarily include wetlands and stream areas, adjacent uplands, sunning spots, loose logs, rocks and soil.

9. The field observations of wildlife species and habitat made during the studies listed above will be used alone, with existing data sources (e.g. Breeding Bird Atlas and range maps) to develop a list of wildlife species likely to occur on the project site.


Attachment 5. Traffic
1. The methodology for assessing the potential impacts from traffic generated by the construction and operation of the Belleayre Resort at the Catskill Park will follow the procedures provided in the following, document:

Transportation Research Board, National Transportation Resources Council. Third Edition 1994, Highway Capacity Manual (with 1997 updates).
2. The roadways to be evaluated in the DEIS will be NY Route 28, Ulster County Route 47, Ulster County Route 49A, Main Street in Pine Hill, and Bonnieview Avenue.
3. Existing data on vehicle traffic and use levels will be obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and County Highway Departments. Historical attendance records and trends will be obtained from Belleayre Mountain Ski Center.
4. Following the review of information discussed in paragraph 3, the documented existing conditions will be compiled to determine use levels and physical characteristics for the roadways identified in paragraph 2.
5. The existing data will be supplemented with a traffic study. The traffic study will consist of the following components:
a. Turning movement counts will be conducted at five selected intersections. Weekend morning and afternoon peak turning movement counts will be made for each intersection. These peak periods will be determined by review of the historical data discussed in paragraph 3. Generally, this will include counts taken during the winter ski season, as well as counts taken during the summer/fall.
b. Roadway geometries will be examined to determine the number of approach lanes, lane and shaller widths, traffic control by approaches, and sight distances. Using this data, a Level of Service (LOS) will be calculated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology.
c. The intersections to be studied are:
  • Route 28/County Road 47 (in Big Indian)
  • Route 28/Main Street (in Pine Hill)
  • Bonnieview Avenue/Main Street
  • Route 28/County Road 49A (to Belleayre)
  • County Road 49A/Belleayre Upper Driveway
6. The Project-related impacts will be determined by conducting a comparison of projected future traffic conditions with existing conditions as determined in paragraphs 4 and 5 under two scenarios: one with the Project and one without the Project. These projections will be performed for the full build out of the proposed project, assuming it is in full operation. Background traffic levels will be projected for the year of full build out using NYSDOT projected growth rates up to the design year. Also included will be a Table listing trip generation rates used in the study. If sources other than ITE are used, they will be explained and documented.

The projections of future conditions will incorporate data from the local planning board regarding any other approved projects that will affect roadway use levels and traffic patterns. NYSDOT's annual traffic information from Route 28 will be used to establish the annual rate of traffic growth for the design year.

7. The results of the Traffic Impact Study will be used to determine the adequacy of the road system to accommodate potential Project vehicle needs. A check at unsignalized intersections to determine if a traffic signal installation is warranted will be performed.
8. Estimates will be prepared to illustrate expected traffic conditions. A trip generation estimate will be prepared and will take into account the total number of expected (peak period) vehicular trips, including employees, visitors, etc. The anticipated vehicular distribution of these trips will also be estimated based on existing traffic distributions. Local intersections where traffic levels are expected to increase 10% or more will be discussed.
9. Figures illustrating the improvements required to offset unacceptable operating conditions caused by the development will be prepared. If a location operates acceptably without the development, it must also operate acceptably with the development.


Attachment 6. Visual Resources and Aesthetics
1. The methodology for the assessment of potential visual and aesthetic impacts will be consistent with the following guidelines.

  • Development in the Adirondack Park Objectives and Guidelines for Planning and Review. Adirondack Park Agency. Updated through April 1991

  • The SEQR Handbook. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. November 1992

  • NYSDEC Program Policy "Assessing and Mitigating Visual Impacts", July 31, 2000
2. Digital terrain modeling shall be utilized to create viewshed mapping. within a five mile radius of the site.
3. Use the digital terrain modeling to identify the potential viewshed areas for each of the development areas. The areas that are blocked from view by landforms and/or vegetation shall then be plotted to produce zones of visibility maps for the areas proposed to be developed.
4. Within each viewshed identify receptor locations listed in publications included in item 1 above and also including public roads and hiking trails, public recreation areas, and areas of historical significance that have potential views into the project development areas.
5. Determine the zone of visibility based on topography and identify potentially sensitive receptors for the proposed development footprints. Sensitive receptors shall include all public roads, public parking areas, public gathering areas, public recreational areas, and public hiking trails within a five-mile radius.
6. Potential vista views from peaks, including any operational fire towers, and overlooks on public hiking trails outside of the five-mile radius will also be examined including the following locations

a. Balsam Mountain
b. Tremper Mountain
c. Panther Mountain
d. Cornell Mountain
e. Slide Mountain
f. Table Mountain
g. Overlook Mountain
h. Twin Mountain
i. Sugarloaf Mountain
j. Plateau Mountain
k. Hunter Mountain
l. Westkill Mountain
m. North Dome Mountain
n. Bearpen Mountain
o. Fir Mountain
p. Giant Ledge

7. Field verify the zone of visibility for the proposed development footprints from all identified receptors including public roads and trails within a five-mile radius, as well as potential vista views from public areas outside of the five-mile radius.
8. Existing structures and features on and around the property, including the Turner Mansion, Wildacres Hotel, Highmount Ski Area and Belleayre Ski Mountain Ski Center shall be used for orientation.
9. ±4 foot diameter colored balloons (red and blue) shall be flown near the lower elevation of development or location of proposed buildings to provide orientation when assessing visibility within the 5 mile radius. Balloons shall be flown at a measured height sufficient to be above the existing tree line.
10. On a clear day with good visibility examine each area identified as having the potential for views into the project. Examinations shall take place during both leaf-on conditions and leaf-off conditions. Examinations shall consist of driving roads, walking hiking trails, and visiting sensitive receptors identified as having potential views. Evaluate the amount of screening provided by forest cover as it may reduce the duration of views or obscure views.

On viewshed maps identify where views do exist and photograph the view into the project. Photographs shall be taken using 50 mm lenses which best simulates the perception of the human eye.

11. Prepare and include in the DEIS the actual zone of visibility map for the project components based upon leaf-on and leaf-off investigations.
12. Include in the DEIS a minimum of five paired photograph-based representative views of visual conditions with and without the development of the project. Paired photographs shall include visualization of all project components including (when visible) structures and site improvements, clearing and grading, and any proposed visual mitigation measures. The selection of representative views to be simulated shall be based on the relative importance of public viewing points, level of viewer exposure and geographic distribution. Representative views shall include the most significantly affected near views as well as affected vista views. The number and location of representative views shall be approved by the Lead Agency upon completion of tasks 2-11 described above.
13. Illustrations of developed conditions shall consist of existing view photographs enhanced either with suitable computer software (i.e. Photoshop®).
14. The DEIS shall include a discussion of the numbers and types (hiking, driving, existing land uses, etc.) of people to be affected, the durations of views that can be expected, and how views may vary between leaf on and leaf off conditions. This shall include a brief discussion concerning the nature of the visual change and the public's probable reaction to such change.
15. The DEIS shall discuss suitable measures to mitigate potential impacts. The discussion shall include measures such as project component locations, structure heights, use of earth tone colors, non-reflective glass, cut-off light fixtures, and other similar type measures.


Attachment 7. Cultural Resources
1. The methodology for assessing cultural resources will follow the procedures outlined in the Standards for Cultural Resource Investigations and the Curation of Archaeological Collections in New York State (New York Archaeological Council, 1994);
2. The Project cultural resource Investigation will be conducted by a professional archaeologist, qualified according to the standards of the New York State Archaeological Council, and the National Park service 36 CFR 61 and 36 CFR 800 Section 14.09 guidelines (hereinafter "the archaeologist"). The OPRHP Coordinator will be consulted throughout the course of the investigation. The methodology to be followed for each of these studies is presented below.
3. The Applicant shall conduct Phase IA and Phase IB cultural resource investigations to identify archaeologically sensitive areas, cultural/sacred areas, and standing structures that are at least 50 years old that may be affected by the Project, and to locate prehistoric and historic cultural/archaeological resources that may exist within the proposed Project Area.
4. The Phase IA investigation will gather information concerning the environmental/physical and cultural settings of the Project Area through a literature search. The Phase IA investigation will consist of the following elements:
a. Preliminary review of historic maps and literature relating to the Project Area.
b. Review of OPRHP and New York State (NYS) Museum archaeological site file inventories. A list of prior projects completed in the immediate area of the Project and a summary of the results of those studies will be developed.
c. Review of the OPRHP lists of sites registered and nominated for inclusion in the State and/or National Register of Historic Places within one mile of the Project Area.
d. An on-site field reconnaissance of the Project Area, with photographic documentation of existing conditions.
e. Assessment of archaeological sensitivity based upon the environmental/physical characteristics of the Project Area and the types and density of cultural sites identified within one mile of the Project Area. Site types likely to be identified and the anticipated condition of these sites will be described.
5. The Phase IB field investigation will be conducted in areas considered to be sensitive for the location of significant cultural resources. The Phase IB investigation will be conducted as follows:
a. The Phase IB field survey, will be limited to potentially sensitive areas identified in the Phase IA survey, within areas of proposed Project alteration.
b. The most efficient means of investigation is through an extensive walkover of the developable lands within the parcels. The walkover is recommended to: 1) identify the presence or absence of map documented structures and/or the remains of such structures within the project area; 2) identify surface evidence of precontact use or occupation; and 3) based on the first two, to identify areas suitable for archeological testing to verify the presence and extent of precontact and/or historic archeological remains.
c. In order to document the presence or absence of cultural resources in the project impact area, an intensive walkover of the six parcels of the project area will be conducted. Based on the results of that walkover, shovel tests will be excavated to verify and mark the extent of resources identified during the walkover. The walkover will focus on the 638 acres which are characterized by less than 15% slope and are thus considered more sensitive to the presence of intact precontact remains. The walkover will extend into areas of greater than 15% slope only to identify the presence or absence of map documented structures and/or their remains within the project's impact area.
d. Where shovel testing is considered necessary, the shovel tests will be 40cm in diameter. The soil from each test will be passed through 0.25 inch hardware cloth and carefully examined for historic and prehistoric cultural materials. The stratigraphy of each test will be recorded including the soil type and depth of each stratum. Artifacts will be assigned to the soil stratum from which they are retrieved. Notations about the surrounding landscape will also be recorded if the archeologists feel that the field conditions have affected the results of the tests. Photographs characterizing the project area will be recorded. The locations of the tests will be recorded on project maps of appropriate scale.
e. All prehistoric cultural material observed will be collected. Historic artifacts such as glass, ceramics, food remains, and the like will also be collected. Coal, ash, cinder, and brick will be noted, but only samples of these will be retained.
f. Cataloging and accessioning tasks will be completed. All cultural materials will be identified by provenience, counted and or weighed. The resulting catalog will be computerized.
g. A report detailing the results of the Phase IB investigations will be prepared and will include a discussion of field methodology, results and will include test excavation records and an artifact inventory.
6. If the Phase IA and IB investigations identify cultural resources within the areas of Project alteration, a Phase II investigation will be designed to obtain detailed information on the integrity, limits, structure, function, and cultural/historical context of an archeological site, sufficient to evaluate its potential National Register eligibility. Phase II field methods and procedures will be developed in consultation with OPREP and conducted by the archaeologist in general accordance with the standards previously cited. The scope of work for the Phase II will be reviewed with NYSDPS and OPRHP prior to implementation.
7. Any Phase II investigation will be designed to obtain detailed information on the integrity, limits, structure, function, and cultural/historical context of an archaeological site, sufficient to evaluate its potential National Register eligibility. Phase II field methods and procedures will be developed in consultation with OPRHP and conducted by the archaeologist in general accordance with the standards previously cited. The scope of work for the Phase II will be reviewed with NYSDPS and OPRHP prior to implementation.
8. Any required artifact processing will be performed by the archaeologist in accordance with OPREP standards. Data will be analyzed for specific stylistic and chronological indicators pertaining to the Northeast region. The type and period of occupation will be described, based on 2nialysiis of the artifacts recovered. Analysis of recovered lithic materials may involve microscopic wear analysis, when appropriate.


Attachment 8. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan and Fertilizer and Pesticide Risk Assessment

The IPM plan shall contain the following;

1. IPM in the planning phase including grass species selection, grading and erosion control plans, a discussion of irrigation water supply, and the process of modeling fertilizer and pesticide behavior as part of the site-specific risk assessment.

2. A description of the proper cultural practices that would serve to maximize turf health while at the same time minimizing the suitability of the environment for potential turf pests. Included shall be a discussion of cultural practices such as mowing, fertilization, irrigation, cultivation, topdressing, etc.

3. The IPM report shall provide specifics pertaining to a proposed pest scouting program. Included shall be such things as the frequency of pest scouting and the responsibility for pest scouting. Also included shall be specific scouting methods for different weed, insect and fungal turf pests, and a discussion of pest treatment thresholds. Also included shall be a discussion of proper record keeping of pest monitoring with sample monitoring forms provided.

4. The IPM plan shall discuss the role of chemical control as it relates to all other factors including pest monitoring and thresholds, implementation of cultural practices, biological control options, and no-action implications.

5. The IPM plan shall discuss each of the potential diseases, insect pests and weeds that are likely to occur on the proposed golf courses. Each pest shall be discussed from the standpoint of monitoring and thresholds, specific cultural practices to control specific pests, and biological controls. Chemical control of each pest shall be discussed in the context of the results of the Fertilizer and Pesticide Risk Assessment performed specifically for this site.

6. Throughout the IPM plan there shall include citations from pertinent and scientifically accredited, peer-reviewed scientific literature for each of the different sections/topics of the IPM plan.

The Fertilizer and Pesticide Risk Assessment shall include the following;

1. The risk assessment shall have as its basis fate and transport models designed to provide numerical prediction of vertical (leaching) and horizontal (runoff) of fertilizer nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and pesticide active ingredients.

2. Prior to performing numerical fate transport modeling, potential pesticides along wit the specific on-site soils will be modeled using the Windows Pesticides Screening Tool(WINPST) developed by the USDA NRCS to provide general background information as to potential hazards to humans and aquatic life.

3. Vertical transport (leaching) potential shall be modeled using the Leaching Estimation and Chemistry Model (LEACHM) developed by Cornell University.

4. Horizontal transport (runoff) potential shall be modeled using the USDA's Chemical Runoff and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems (CREAMS) and shall incorporate the steeper areas proposed for golf

5. Simulations shall include a full one year modeling period.

6. Input data for both models shall include local climatological data collected at an accredited monitoring location and the data shall include rainfall from a year when rainfall was higher than average precipitation conditions.

7. Irrigation shall be simulated within the modeling and irrigation shall be simulated on a replacement basis (rainfall minus evapotranspiration) and applied in half inch increments.

8. Soils that shall be modeled shall include all soil series found on the proposed golf course based on an on-site soil survey by a professional soil scientist. Input parameters for the soils being modeled shall be consistent with data published by the USDA or other accredited sources.

9. The application rates of pesticides shall be consistent with product labels and the modeling shall incorporate reasonable re-treatment scenarios within the year being modeled.

10. Pesticide characteristics such as half-life, water solubility, vapor pressure, washoff fraction, etc. shall be taken from published sources.

11. Model-predicted concentrations of pesticides shall be assessed in conjunction with human health guidelines such as MCL, HAL, RFD or other similar parameters. Model-predicted pesticide concentrations shall also be compared to published toxicological data for aquatic (salmonid and aquatic invertebrate) species as well as terrestrial (avian and mammalian) species.

12. The results of the produced from item 11 above will serve as the basis for recommended use restrictions for different pesticides and/or specific locations.

13. Model-predicted nutrient export coefficients will be compared with published nutrient export coefficients for the current existing conditions of the project site.

14. The fertilizer and pesticide risk assessment shall also contain a discussion of Best Management Practices that can be implemented to further reduce potential impacts associated with fertilizer and pesticide use.


Project Description
Cover Sheet
Executive Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Location
1.2 General Project Description
1.3 Project Purpose, Need and Benefits
1.4 Environmental Review, Permits and Approvals
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
2.1 Overall Project Design and Layout
2.2 Project Components
2.3 Construction Activities
2.4 Operational Stage Activities
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
3.1 Geologic and Topographic Resources
3.2 Surface Water Resources
3.3 Groundwater Resources
3.4 Climate and Air Resources
3.5 Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology
3.6 Soils
3.7 Traffic Patterns
3.8 Land Use and Community Character
3.9 Community Services
3.10 Socio-Economic Setting
3.11 Cultural Resources
4.0 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
5.0 ALTERNATIVES
5.1 Alternative Locations
5.2 Alternative Use of the Site
5.3 Alternative Layouts
5.4 Alternative Water Supply
5.5 Alternative Wastewater Disposal
5.6 Alternative Site Access
5.7 Alternative Golf Course Management Practices
5.8 Alternative Stormwater Management Practices
5.9 No-Action Alternative
6.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES
7.0 GROWTH INDUCING, SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
8.0 EFFECT ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
9.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION
Attachment 1. Potable Water Supply
Attachment 2. Wastewater Disposal
Attachment 3. Stormwater and Sediment and Erosion Control
Attachment 4. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species
Attachment 5. Traffic
Attachment 6. Visual Resources and Aesthetics
Attachment 7. Cultural Resources
Attachment 8. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan

For questions or comments, contact Alec Ciesluk, NYS DEC, at (845) 256-3014 or afcieslu@gw.dec.state.ny.us .

Home | Organization | Heritage | Issues | MountainWatch (PDF) | Directory | Links